THE APOSTLE PAUL’S FEAR
I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ’ 2 Cor. 11:3.
The text which heads this article, contains one part of the experience of a very famous Christian. No servant of Christ perhaps has left such – mark for good on the world as the Apostle Paul. When he was born the whole Roman Empire, excepting one little corner, was sunk in the darkest heathenism; when he died the mighty fabric of heathenism was shaken to its very centre, and ready to fall. And none of the agents whom God used to produce this marvellous change did more than Saul of Tarsus, after his conversion. Yet even in the midst of his successes and usefulness we find him crying out, ‘I fear.’
There is a melancholy ring about these words which demands our attention. They show a man of many cares and anxieties. He who supposes that St. Paul lived a life of ease, because he was a chosen apostle, wrought miracles, founded Churches, and wrote inspired epistles, has yet much to learn. Nothing can be more unlike the truth! The eleventh chapter of the second Epistle to the Corinthians tells a very different tale. It is a chapter which deserves attentive study. Partly from the opposition of the heathen philosophers and priests, whose craft was in danger, – partly from the bitter enmity of his own unbelieving countrymen, – partly from false or weak brethren, – partly from his own thorn in the flesh, – the great Apostle of the Gentiles was like his Master, – ‘a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief (Isa. 53:3).
But of all the burdens which St. Paul had to carry, none seems to have weighed him down so much as that to which he refers, when he writes to the Corinthians, – ‘the care of all the churches’ (2 Cor. 11:28). The scanty knowledge of many primitive Christians, – their weak faith,
– their shallow experience, – their dim hope, – their low standard of holiness, – all these things made them peculiarly liable to be led astray by false teachers, and to depart from the faith. Like little children, hardly able to walk, they required to be treated with immense patience. Like exotics in a hothouse, they had to be watched with incessant care. Can we doubt that they kept their Apostolic founder in a state of constant tender anxiety? Can we wonder that he says to the Colossians, ‘What great conflict I have for you?’ – and to the Galatians, ‘I marvel that yea are so soon removed from him who called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel.’ – ‘O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you?’ (Col. 2:1; Gal. 1:6; 3:1). No attentive reader can study the Epistles without seeing this subject repeatedly cropping up. And the text I have placed at the head of this paper is a sample of what I mean:
– ‘I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.’ That text contains three important lessons, which I wish to press on the attention of all my readers. I believe in my conscience they are lessons for the times.
1. First, the text shows us a spiritual disease to which we are all liable, and which we ought to fear. That disease is corruption of our minds: – ‘I fear lest your minds be corrupted.’
2. Secondly, the text shows us an example which we ought to remember, as a beacon: – ‘The serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty.’
3. Thirdly, the text shows us a point about which we ought specially to be on our guard. That point is corruption ‘from the simplicity that is in Christ.’
The text is a deep mine, and is not without difficulty. But let us go down into it boldly, and we shall find it contains much precious metal.
First, then, there is a spiritual disease, which we ought to fear:
‘Corruption of mind.’
I take ‘Corruption of mind’ to mean injury of our minds by the reception of false and un-Scriptural doctrines in religion. And I believe the sense of the Apostle to be; I fear lest your minds should imbibe erroneous and unsound views of Christianity. I fear lest you should take up, as truths, principles which are not the truth. I fear lest you should depart from the faith once delivered to the saints, and embrace views which are practically destructive of the Gospel of Christ.
The fear expressed by the Apostle is painfully instructive, and at first sight may create surprise. Who would have thought that under the very eyes of Christ’s own chosen disciples, – while the blood of Calvary was hardly yet dry, while the age of miracles had not yet passed away, -who would have thought that in a day like this there was any danger of Christians departing from the faith? Yet nothing is more certain than that ‘the mystery of iniquity’ began already to work before the Apostles were dead (2 Thess. 2:7). ‘Even now,’ says John, ‘there are many antichrists’ (1 John 2:18). And no fact in Church history is more clearly proved than this – that false doctrine has never ceased to be the plague of Christendom for the last eighteen centuries. Looking forward with the eye of a prophet, Paul might well say ‘I fear:’ – ‘I fear not merely the corruption of your morals, but of your minds.’
(a) False doctrine soon overspread the primitive Church after the death of the Apostles, whatever some may please to say of primitive purity. Partly by strange teaching about the Trinity and the Person of Christ, partly by an absurd multiplication of new-fangled ceremonies, partly by the introduction of monasticism and a man-made asceticism, the light of the Church was soon dimmed and its usefulness destroyed. Even in Augustine’s time, as the preface to the English Prayer-book tells us, ‘Ceremonies were grown to such a number that the estate of Christian people was in worse case concerning this matter than were the Jews.’ Here was the corruption of men’s minds.
(b) False doctrine in the middle ages so completely over-spread the church, that the truth as it is in Jesus was well nigh buried or drowned. During the last three centuries before the Reformation, it is probable that very few Christians in Europe could have answered the question, ‘What must I do to be saved?’ Popes and Cardinals, Abbots and Priors, Archbishops and Bishops, Priests and Deacons, Monks and Nuns, were, with a few rare exceptions, steeped in ignorance and superstition. They were sunk into a deep sleep, from which they were only partially roused by the earthquake of the Reformation. Here, again, was the ‘corruption of men’s minds.’
(c) False doctrine, since the days of the Reformation, has continually been rising up again, and marring the work which the Reformers began. Neologianism in some districts of Europe, Socinianism in others, formalism and indifferentism in others, have withered blossoms which once promised to bear good fruit, and made Protestantism a mere barren form. Here, again, has been the ‘corruption of the mind.’
(d) False doctrine, even in our own day and under our own eyes, is eating out the heart of the Church of England and imperilling her existence. One school of Churchmen does not hesitate to avow its dislike to the principles of the Reformation, and compasses sea and land to Romanize the Establishment. – Another school, with equal coldness, speaks lightly of inspiration, sneers at the very idea of supernatural religion, and tries hard to cast overboard miracles as so much lumber. – Another school proclaims liberty to every shade and form of religious opinion, and tells us that all teachers are equally deserving our confidence, however heterogeneous and contradictory their opinions, if they are only clever, earnest, and sincere. To each and all the same remark applies. They illustrate the ‘corruption of men’s minds.’
In the face of such facts as these, we may well lay to heart the words of the Apostle in the text which heads the paper. Like him we have abundant cause to feel afraid. Never, I think, was there such need for English Christians to stand on their guard. Never was there such need for faithful ministers to cry aloud and spare not. ‘If the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself for the battle?’ (1 Cor. 14.8).
I charge every loyal member of the Church of England* to open his eyes to the peril in which his own Church stands, and to beware lest it takes damage through apathy and a morbid love of peace. Controversy is an odious thing; but there are days when it is a positive duty. Peace is an excellent thing; but, like gold, it may be bought too dear. Unity is a mighty blessing; but it is worthless if it is purchased at the cost of truth. Once more I say, Open your eyes and be on your guard.
The nation that rests satisfied with its commercial prosperity, and neglects its national defences, because they are troublesome or expensive, is likely to become a prey to the first Alaric, or Attila, or Tamerlane, or Napoleon, who chooses to attack it. The Church which is ‘rich, and increased with goods,’ may think it has ‘need of nothing,’ because of its antiquity, orders, and endowments. It may cry ‘Peace, peace,’ and flatter itself it shall see no evil. But if it is not careful about the maintenance of sound doctrine among its ministers and members, it must never be surprised if its candlestick is taken away.
I deprecate, from the bottom of my heart, despondency or cowardice at this crisis. All I say is, let us exercise a godly fear. I do not see the slightest necessity for forsaking the old ship, and giving it up for lost. Bad as things look inside our ark, they are not a whit better outside. But I do protest against that careless spirit of slumber which seems to seal the eyes of many Churchmen, and to blind them to the enormous peril in which we are placed by the rise and progress of false doctrine in these days. I protest against the common notion so often proclaimed by men in high places, that unity is of more importance than sound doctrine, and peace more valuable than truth. And I call on every reader who really loves the Church of England to recognise the dangers of the times, and to do his duty, manfully and energetically, in resisting them by united action and by prayer. It was not for nothing that our Lord said, ‘He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one’ (Luke 22:36). Let us not forget Paul’s words, ‘Watch ye: stand fast in the faith. Quit you like men: be strong’ (1 Cor. 16:13). Our noble Reformers bought the truth at the price of their own blood, and handed it down to us. Let us take heed that we do not basely sell it for a mess of pottage, under the specious names of unity and peace.
Secondly, the text shows us an example we shall do well to remember, as a beacon: ‘The serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty.’
I need hardly remind my readers that Paul in this place refers to the story of the fall in the third chapter of Genesis, as a simple historical fact. He does not afford the least countenance to the modern notion that the book of Genesis is nothing more than a pleasing collection of myths and fables. He does not hint that there is no such being as the devil, and that there was not any literal eating of the forbidden fruit, and that it was not really in this way that sin entered into the world. On the contrary, he narrates the story of the third of Genesis as a veracious history of a thing that really took place.
You should remember, moreover, that this reference does not stand alone. It is a noteworthy fact that several of the most remarkable histories and miracles of the Pentateuch are expressly mentioned in the New Testament, and always as historical facts. Cain and Abel, Noah’s ark, the destruction of Sodom, Esau’s selling his birthright, the destruction of the first-born in Egypt, the passage of the Red Sea, the brazen serpent, the manna, the water flowing from the rock, Balaam’s ass speaking, – all these things are named by the writers of the New Testament, and named as matters of fact and not as fables. Let that never be forgotten. Those who are fond of pouring contempt on Old Testament miracles, and making light of the authority of the Pentateuch, would do well to consider whether they know better than our Lord Jesus Christ and the Apostles. To my mind, to talk of Genesis as a collection of myths and fables, in the face of such a text of Scripture as we have before us in this paper, sounds alike unreasonable and profane. Was St. Paul mistaken or not, when he narrated the story of the temptation and the fall? If he was, he was a weak-minded credulous person, and may have been mistaken on fifty other subjects. At this rate there is an end of all his authority as a writer! From such a monstrous conclusion we may well turn away with scorn. But it is well to remember that much infidelity begins with irreverent contempt of the Old Testament.
The point, after all, which the Apostle would have us mark in the history of Eve’s fall, is the ‘subtilty’ with which the devil led her into sin. He did not tell her flatly that he wished to deceive her and do her harm. On the contrary, he told her that the thing forbidden was a thing that was ‘good for food, and pleasant to the eyes, and to be desired to make one wise’ (Gen. 3:6). He did not scruple to assert that she might eat the forbidden fruit and yet ‘not die.’ He blinded her eyes to the sinfulness and danger of transgression. He persuaded her to believe that to depart from God’s plain command was for her benefit and not for her ruin. In short, ‘he beguiled her by his subtilty.’
Now this ‘subtilty,’ St. Paul tells us, is precisely what we have to fear, in false doctrine. We are not to expect it to approach our minds in the garment of error, but in the form of truth. Bad coin would never obtain currency if it had not some likeness to good. The wolf would seldom get into the fold if he did not enter it in sheep’s clothing. Popery and infidelity would do little harm if they went about the world under their .true names. Satan is far too wise a general to manage a campaign in such a fashion as this. He employs fine words and high-sounding phrases, such as ‘Catholicity, Apostolicity, Unity, Church order, sound church views, free thought, broad sense, kindly judgment, liberal interpretation of Scripture,’ and the like, and thus effects a lodgment in unwary minds. And this is precisely the ‘subtilty’ which Paul refers to in the text. We need not doubt that he had read his Master’s solemn words in the Sermon on the mount: ‘Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly they are ravening wolves’ (Matt. 7:15).
I ask your special attention to this point. Such is the simplicity and innocence of many Churchmen in this day, that they actually expect false doctrine to look false, and will not understand that the very essence of its mischievousness, as a rule, is its resemblance to God’s truth. A young Churchman, for instance, brought up from his cradle to hear nothing but Evangelical teaching, is suddenly invited some day to hear a sermon preached by some eminent teacher of semi-Romish, or semi-sceptical opinions. He goes into the church, expecting in his simplicity to hear nothing but heresy from the beginning to the end. To his amazement he hears a clever, eloquent sermon, containing a vast amount of truth, and only a few homeopathic drops of error. Too often a violent reaction takes place in his simple, innocent, unsuspicious mind. He begins to think his former teachers were illiberal, narrow, and uncharitable, and his confidence in them is shaken, perhaps for ever. Too often, alas! it ends with his entire perversion, and at last he is enrolled in the ranks of the Ritualists or the Broad Churchmen! And what is the history of the whole case? Why, a foolish forgetfulness of the lesson Paul puts forward in this text. ‘As the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty,’ so Satan beguiles unwary souls in the nineteenth century [and in the twentieth! Ed.] by approaching them under the garb of truth.
I beseech every reader of this paper to remember this part of my subject, and to stand upon his guard. What more common than to hear it said of some false teacher in this day, – ‘He is so good, so devoted, so kind, so zealous, so laborious, so humble, so self-denying, so charitable, so earnest, so fervent, so clever, so evidently sincere, there can be no danger and no harm in hearing him. Besides, he preaches so much real Gospel: no one can preach a better sermon than he does sometimes! I never can and never will believe he is unsound.’ – Who does not hear continually such talk as this? What discerning eye can fail to see that many Churchmen expect unsound teachers to be open vendors of poison, and cannot realize that they often appear as ‘angels of light,’ and are far too wise to be always saying all they think, and showing their whole hand and mind. But so it is. Never was it so needful to remember the words, ‘The serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty.’
I leave this part of my subject with the sorrowful remark that we have fallen upon times when suspicion on the subject of sound doctrine is not only a duty but a virtue. It is not the avowed Pharisee and Sadducee that we have to fear, but the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees. It is the ‘show of wisdom’ with which Ritualism is invested that makes it so dangerous to many minds (Col. 2:23). It seems so good, and fair, and zealous, and holy, and reverential, and devout, and kind, that it carries away many well-meaning people like a flood. He that would be safe must cultivate the spirit of a sentinel at a critical post. He must not mind being laughed at and ridiculed, as one who ‘has a keen nose for heresy.’ In days like these he must not be ashamed to suspect danger. And if any one scoffs at him for so doing, he may well be content to reply, ‘The serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty.’
3. The third and last lesson of the text remains yet to be considered. It shows us a point about which we ought to be especially on our guard. That point is called ‘The simplicity that is in Christ.’
Now the expression before us is somewhat remarkable, and stands alone in the New Testament. One thing at any rate is abundantly clear:
the word simplicity means that which is single and unmixed, in contradistinction to that which is mixed and double. Following out that idea, some have held that the expression means ‘singleness of affection towards Christ;’ – we are to fear lest we should divide our affections between Christ and any other. This is no doubt very good theology; but I question whether it is the true sense of the text. -I prefer the opinion that the expression means the simple, unmixed, unadulterated, unaltered doctrine of Christ, – the simple ‘truth as it is in Jesus,’ on all points, – without addition, subtraction, or substitution. Departure from the simple genuine prescription of the Gospel, either by leaving out any part or adding any part, was the thing Paul would have the Corinthians specially dread. The expression is full of meaning, and seems specially written for our learning in these last days. We are to be ever jealously on our guard, lest we depart from and corrupt the simple Gospel which Christ once delivered to the saints.
The expression before us is exceedingly instructive. The principle it contains is of unspeakable importance. If we love our souls and would keep them in a healthy state, we must endeavour to adhere closely to the simple doctrine of Christ, in every jot, tittle, and particular. Once add to it or take away anything from it, and you risk spoiling the Divine medicine, and may even turn it into poison. Let your ruling principle be, – ‘No other doctrine but that of Christ; nothing less, and nothing more!’ Lay firm hold on that principle, and never let it go. Write it on the table of your heart, and never forget it.
(1) Let us settle it, for example, firmly in our minds, that there is no way of peace but the simple way marked out by Christ. True rest of conscience and inward peace of soul will never come from anything but direct faith in Christ Himself and His finished work. Peace by auricular confession, or bodily asceticism, or incessant attendance at Church services, or frequent reception of the Lord’s Supper, is a delusion and a snare. It is only by coming straight to Jesus Himself, labouring and heavy laden, and by believing, trusting communion with Him, that souls find rest. In this matter let us stand fast in ‘the simplicity that is in Christ.’
(2) Let us settle it next in our minds that there is no other priest who can be in any way a mediator between yourself and God but Jesus Christ. He Himself has said, and His word shall not pass away, ‘No man cometh unto the Father but by me’ (John 14:6). No sinful child of Adam, whatever be his orders, and however high his ecclesiastical title, can ever occupy Christ’s place, or do what Christ alone is appointed to do. The priesthood is Christ’s peculiar office, and it is one which He has never deputed to another. In this matter also let us stand fast in ‘the simplicity that is in Christ.’
(3) Let us settle it next in our minds that there is no sacrifice for sin except the one sacrifice of Christ upon the cross. Listen not for a moment to those who tell you that there is any sacrifice in the Lord’s Supper, any repetition of Christ’s offering on the cross, or any oblation of His body and blood, under the form of consecrated bread and wine. The one sacrifice for sins which Christ offered was a perfect and complete sacrifice, and it is nothing short of blasphemy to attempt to repeat it. ‘By one offering he has perfected for ever them that are sanctified’ (Heb. 10:14). In this matter also let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
(4) Let us settle it next in our minds that there is no other rule of faith, and judge of controversies, but that simple one to which Christ always referred, – the written Word of God. Let no man disturb our souls by such vague expressions as ‘the voice of the Church, primitive antiquity, the judgment of the early Fathers,’ and the like tall talk. Let our only standard of truth be the Bible, God’s Word written. ‘What saith the scripture’?’ – ‘What is written?’ – ‘How readest thou’?’ – ‘To the law and the testimony!’ – ‘Search the scriptures’ (Rom. 4:3; Luke 10:26; Isa. 8:20; John 5:39). In this matter also let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
(5) Let us settle it next in our minds that there are no other means of grace in the Church which have any binding authority, except those well known and simple ones which Christ and the Apostles have sanctioned. Let us regard with a jealous suspicion all ceremonies and forms of man’s invention, when they are invested with such exaggerated importance as to thrust into the background God’s own appointments. It is the invariable tendency of man’s inventions to supersede God’s ordinances. Let us beware of making the Word of God of none effect by human devices. In this matter also let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
(6) Let us settle it next in our minds that no teaching about the Sacraments is sound which gives them a power of which Christ says nothing. Let us beware of admitting that either baptism or the Lord’s Supper can confer grace ‘ex opere operato,’ – that is, by their mere outward administration, independently of the state of heart of those who receive them. Let us remember that the only proof that baptized people and communicants have grace, is the exhibition of grace in their lives. The fruits of the Spirit are the only evidences that we are born of the Spirit and one with Christ, and not the mere reception of the Sacraments. In this matter also let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
(7) Let us settle it next in our minds that no teaching about the Holy Ghost is safe which cannot be reconciled with the simple teaching of Christ. They are not to be heard who assert that the Holy Ghost actually dwells in all baptized people, without exception, by virtue of their baptism, and that this grace within such people only needs to be ‘stirred up.’ The simple teaching of our Lord is, that He dwells only in those who are His believing disciples, and that the world neither knows, nor sees, nor can receive the Holy Spirit (John 14:17). His in-dwelling is the special privilege of Christ’s people, and where He is He will be seen. On this point also let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
(8) Finally let us settle it in our minds that no teaching can be thoroughly sound, in which truth is not set forth in the proportion of Christ and the Apostles. Let us beware of any teaching in which the main thing is an incessant exaltation of the Church, the ministry, or the sacraments, while such grand verities as repentance, faith, conversion, holiness, are comparatively left in a subordinate and inferior place. Place such teaching side by side with the teaching of the Gospels, Acts, and Epistles. Count up texts. Make a calculation. Mark how little comparatlvely is said in the New Testament about baptism, the Lord’s Supper, the Church, and the ministry; and then judge for yourself what is the proportion of truth. In this matter also, I say once more, let us stand fast in the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
The simple doctrine and rule of Christ, then – nothing added, nothing taken away, nothing substituted – this is the mark at which we ought to aim. This is the point from which departure ought to be dreaded. Can we improve on His teaching? Are we wiser than He? Can we suppose that He left anything of real vital importance unwritten, or liable to the vague reports of human traditions? Shall we take on ourselves to say that we can mend or change for the better any ordinance of His appointment? Can we doubt that in matters about which He is silent we have need to act very cautiously, very gently, very moderately, and must beware of pressing them on those who do not see with our eyes? Above all must we not beware of asserting anything to be needful to salvation of which Christ has said nothing at all? I only see one answer to such questions as these. We must beware of anything which has even the appearance of departure from the ‘simplicity that is in Christ.’
The plain truth is that we cannot sufficiently exalt the Lord Jesus Christ as the great Head of the Church, and Lord of all ordinances, no less than as the Saviour of sinners. I take it we all fail here. We do not realize how high and great and glorious a King the Son of God is, and what undivided loyalty we owe to One who has not deputed any of His offices, or given His glory to another. The solemn words which John Owen addressed to the House of Commons, in a sermon on the ‘Greatness of Christ,’ deserve to be remembered. I fear the House of Commons hears few such sermons in the present day.
‘Christ is the way: men without Him are Cains, wanderers, vagabonds. His is the truth: men without Him are liars, like the devil of old. He is the life: men without Him are dead in trespasses and sins. He is the light: men without Him are in darkness, and go they know not whither. He is the vine: men that are not in Him are withered branches prepared for the fire. He is the rock: men not built on Him are carried away with a flood. He is the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the author and the ender, the founder and finisher of our salvation. He that hath not Him hath neither beginning of good nor shall have end of misery. Oh, blessed Jesus, how much better were it not to be than to be without Thee! never to be born than not to die in Thee! A thousand hells come short of this, eternally to want Jesus Christ.’ This witness is true. If we can say Amen to the spirit of this passage it will be well with our souls.
And now let me conclude this paper by offering a few parting words of counsel to any one into whose hands it may fall. I offer them not as one who has any authority but one who is affectionately desirous to do good to his brethren. I offer them especially to all who are members of the Church of England, though I believe they will be found useful by all English Christians. And I offer them as counsels which I find helpful to my own soul, and as such I venture to think they will be helpful to others.
(1) In the first place, if we would be kept from falling away into false doctrine, let us arm our minds with a thorough knowledge of God’s Word. Let us read our Bibles from beginning to end with daily diligence, and constant prayer for the teaching of the Holy Spirit, and so strive to become thoroughly familiar with their contents. Ignorance of the Bible is the root of all error, and a superficial acquaintance with it accounts for many of the sad perversions and defections of the present day. In a hurrying age of railways and telegraphs, I am firmly persuaded that many Christians do not give time enough to private reading of the Scriptures. I doubt seriously whether English people did not know their Bibles better two hundred years ago than they do now. The consequence is, that they are ‘tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine,’ and fall an easy prey to the first clever teacher of error who tries to influence their minds. I entreat my readers to remember this counsel, and take heed to their ways. It is as true now as ever, that the good textuary is the only good theologian, and that a familiarity with great leading texts, is, as our Lord proved in the temptation, one of the best safeguards against error. Arm yourself then with the sword of the Spirit, and let your hand become used to it. I am well aware that there is no royal road to Bible-knowledge. Without diligence and pains no one ever becomes ‘mighty in the Scriptures.’ ‘Justification,’ said Charles Simeon, with his characteristic quaintness, ‘is by faith, but knowledge of the Bible comes by works.’ But of one thing I am certain: there is no labour which will be so richly repaid as laborious regular daily study of God’s Word.
(2) The second counsel which I venture to offer is this. Let us make
ourselves thoroughly acquainted with the history of the English Reformation. My reason for offering this counsel is my firm conviction that this highly important part of English history has of late years been undeservedly neglected. Thousands of Churchmen nowadays have a most inadequate notion of the amount of our debt to our martyred Reformers. They have no distinct conception of the state of darkness and superstition in which our fathers lived, and of the light and liberty which the Reformation brought in. And the consequence is that they see no great harm in the Romanizing movement of the present day, and have very indistinct ideas of the real nature and work of Popery. It is high time that a better state of things should begin. Of one thing I am thoroughly convinced: a vast amount of the prevailing apathy about the Romanizing movement of the day may be traced up to gross ignorance, both of the true nature of Popery and of the Protestant Reformation.
Ignorance, after all, is one of the best friends of false doctrine. More light is one of the great wants of the day, even in the nineteenth century. Thousands are led astray by Popery or infidelity from sheer want of reading and information. Once more I repeat, if men would only study with attention the Bible, and the History of the Reformation, I should have little fear of their ‘minds being corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.’